The short answer: among greenhouse covering materials, for most farmers the optimal choice is professional polyethylene film. Agro Ornament’s offered standard is 180-micron, five-component film; the ≈3.50 GEL/m² figure below is a market example for alternative 160-micron professional film, not the price of our standard film. Professional UV-protected film lasts 3–4 years; for year-round intensive production twin-wall polycarbonate is better — it serves 7–10 years and retains heat best of all; glass transmits the most light (90–92%) and lasts over 25 years, but it is heavy, breaks in hail and costs the most. The price scale: a turnkey film-covered greenhouse costs 75–85 GEL/m², a polycarbonate one — 200–250 GEL/m² (full breakdown: how much a greenhouse costs). Below we compare all three materials in numbers so the choice is easy to make.

Greenhouse covering materials compared — polyethylene film, twin-wall polycarbonate and glass
Film, polycarbonate and glass — the three main greenhouse covering materials (illustrative photo).
≈3.50 GEL/m²
market example for alternative 160 µm film
7–10 years
polycarbonate lifespan
90–92%
glass light transmission
30–40%
less heat loss with double film

Three covering materials at a glance: pros and cons

Polyethylene film

  • Market example: alternative professional 160-micron film ≈3.50 GEL/m²; Agro Ornament’s standard is 180-micron, five-component film, priced separately
  • Simple installation and quick replacement when needed
  • UV-protected film lasts 3–4 years
  • A double inflated system cuts heat loss by 30–40%
  • Ordinary (non-professional) polyethylene tears apart in the sun within months
  • Single-layer film insulates poorly (R ≈ 0.85)
  • Needs renewing every 3–4 years

Twin-wall polycarbonate

  • Best insulation (R 1.70–2.50) — winter heating costs less
  • Very strong and hail-resistant
  • Serves 7–10 years
  • The twin-wall structure holds heat well
  • High price — a 6 mm sheet (2.1×6 m) costs 180 GEL
  • Yellows in the sun without a UV-protective layer
  • The surface scratches easily
  • Transmits slightly less light than film (75–80%)

Glass

  • Maximum light transmission — 90–92%
  • Lasts over 25 years
  • Does not yellow over time
  • Retains heat well
  • The most expensive option — 'extremely high' price class
  • Heavy — requires a reinforced structure
  • Breaks easily in hail
  • Cold air enters through installation gaps in winter

Film, polycarbonate and glass in numbers — comparing the properties

The covering defines the greenhouse microclimate: it must transmit light well and retain as much heat as possible. Here is how the four main options look in a table compiled with international methodology (FAO/UGA/NYSERDA):

MaterialLight transmissionInsulation (R-value)LifespanPrice class
Standard film (PE)85–87%0.85 — low1–3 yearslow
Double film + IRAC76–78%1.50 — medium3–4 yearsmoderate
Polycarbonate (twin-wall)75–80%1.70–2.50 — high7–10 yearshigh
Glass (double thickness)90–92%0.90–1.10 — low25+ yearsextremely high
The higher the R-value, the better the material retains heat. Source: handbook based on FAO/UGA/NYSERDA.

The table shows the main trade-off clearly: the better the insulation, the less light the material transmits — polycarbonate has the highest R-value but transmits 75–80% of light, while glass is the opposite: it transmits light almost fully but cannot boast about retaining heat. So for winter production give priority to insulation; for seasonal production — to price and light.

What covering material costs per square metre

Covering material cost (material only, GEL/m²)

Market example: alternative film 160 µmDouble film (2 layers)Polycarbonate 6 mm0481216
The film bar is a market example for an alternative 160-micron product, not Agro Ornament’s offered standard; confirm the price of our standard 180-micron, five-component film with the supplier. Polycarbonate: 180 GEL ÷ 12.6 m² (2.1×6 m sheet) ≈ 14.3 GEL/m²; double film is the cost of two layers, the inflation blower is added separately. Glass has no single market price — it sits in the 'extremely high' class. Installation and structure are not included.

For scale, the market example using alternative 160-micron film assumes that a 400 m² (10×40 m) farm greenhouse needs film 16 m wide and 44 m long — ≈2,464 GEL in total, roughly a third of the whole DIY budget. This is not an offer for Agro Ornament’s standard 180-micron, five-component film; its price is confirmed separately. With turnkey construction, material selection, delivery and installation are calculated in a single price — see greenhouse construction services.

Which covering material suits which greenhouse

  • Arched (tunnel) greenhouse — film: the most common and cheapest combination for seasonal commercial production; the film is fastened to the arches with an aluminium zigzag profile
  • Year-round farm production — double inflated film or polycarbonate: both sharply cut heating costs
  • Small family (gable) greenhouse — polycarbonate: for example, the 3.6×4.8 m timber greenhouse project specifies 6 mm twin-wall sheets, with materials totalling ≈150–160 GEL/m²
  • Seedling boxes (hotbed/cold frame) — glass or polycarbonate on a sloped lid
  • A permanent premium-class structure — glass: maximum light and a 25+ year lifespan justify the high price

When choosing polycarbonate, the installation rules matter too: the sheets must be mounted with the internal channels running vertically so condensate drains freely; sheets are joined to each other with H-profiles, open ends are sealed with U-profiles, and the sheets are fastened to the structure with special screws with rubber washers. Ignoring these details sharply shortens the material's life.

Double inflated greenhouse film — the sweet spot

If you choose film but worry about heating bills, NYSERDA's recommendation is clear: double inflated film cuts heat loss by 30–40% (in exchange, light transmission drops by ≈10%). Use IRAC film as the inner layer: its anti-condensate (AC) coating stops droplets from hanging on the ceiling — water runs down the walls in a thin sheet, more light gets through, and leaves are not burned by the 'lens effect'. The infrared (IR) additive slows heat escape at night and delivers an extra ≈20% energy saving. The full picture of winter costs: heating and energy efficiency.

Start with film and switch to polycarbonate later if needed — the structure stays the same. That way the initial investment is minimal and you can expand step by step. Which structure suits which material — see greenhouse types and structures.

Check before buying a greenhouse covering

Covering material checklist

0/7

Frequently asked questions about covering materials

How long does greenhouse film last?

Ordinary polyethylene tears apart in the sun within months, while professional UV-protected film lasts 3–4 years. Correct installation extends the life too — felt protective tape on the structure and white paint protect the film from contact with hot metal (in summer a pipe heats up to 70°C).

What film thickness should I choose?

Agro Ornament’s offered standard is 180-micron, five-component film. Before purchase, also confirm the UV protection and anti-condensate (AC) properties required by the project in the product data sheet.

Is a glass greenhouse worth it?

Glass gives the best light (90–92%) and lasts 25+ years, but it is heavy, breaks in hail, costs a lot, and cold air enters through installation gaps in winter. For commercial production, film or polycarbonate is more practical; glass suits permanent premium-class structures.

Can I start with film and switch to polycarbonate later?

Yes, that is a common strategy — the structure suits both materials, so changing the covering does not require rebuilding the structure. And half the cost can be covered by state co-financing — details on the programme page.

Can't decide which material suits your region best?

Send us the dimensions, your region and what you plan to grow — we will select the covering and you will receive an exact estimate within 24 hours. The consultation is free.